If you’re trying to decide where to go for the best possible aurora experience, there are a few key differences that can help you make the right choice for your trip.
Let’s break it down.
Visibility: Where Are You More Likely to See the Northern Lights?
If your main goal is to maximize your chances of seeing the auroras, Finland has the upper hand.
In Finnish Lapland, the Northern Lights are visible on roughly every second clear night between late August and early April – especially between September and March, which is peak season.
The skies are generally clearer in Lapland than in Iceland, and the farther north you go, the better your odds.
Iceland is further south, and while auroras can be visible there too, cloud cover is a frequent issue.
Iceland’s coastal weather tends to be wetter and more unpredictable. Even when there’s high solar activity, clouds can easily block the view.
Winner: Finland, for more frequent and consistent aurora sightings.
Accessibility and Travel Experience
Iceland is easier to reach for many travelers, especially from North America.
The country is small and compact, making it easy to plan a short road trip from Reykjavik to the countryside where you can escape light pollution.
Finland, on the other hand, offers a different kind of experience.
Once you’re in Lapland – for example at Kelo Resort, located right next to a national park – you’re far from cities and artificial light.
You can literally see the lights from your doorstep, no driving required.
Winner: Tie, depending on how adventurous or laid-back you want your trip to be.
Landscape and Atmosphere
Iceland has jaw-dropping landscapes – black sand beaches, volcanoes, waterfalls, and glaciers.
Watching the Northern Lights dance above those dramatic scenes is unforgettable.
But Finnish Lapland brings something else entirely: deep stillness, snowy forests, and total peace.
You’ll find frozen lakes, fells, and silence so complete that you can hear the snow fall.
It’s a serene, almost spiritual setting that many travelers return to again and again.
If you’re looking for raw drama, Iceland wins.
If you’re craving calm and magic, Finland is hard to beat.
Comfort and Accommodation
When it comes to staying warm and cozy while waiting for the lights, Finland excels.
Resorts like Kelo offer aurora alerts and guided tours, all without the crowds.
In Iceland, accommodation options outside Reykjavik can be more limited and basic, especially in winter.
Self-driving is common, which means you might spend long nights behind the wheel chasing clear skies.
Winner: Finland, especially for comfort and convenience.
Conclusion: Iceland vs Finland for Northern Lights?
Here’s the bottom line:
-
Go to Finland if you want higher chances of clear skies, cozy aurora cabins, and a peaceful, snowy wilderness where the lights feel like they belong.
-
Go to Iceland if you’re also interested in dramatic landscapes and don’t mind chasing the auroras between cloud systems.
If the Northern Lights are your main reason for traveling, Finland is the safer and more rewarding choice.
Especially if you head north to remote places like Kelo Resort, where the skies are dark, the air is crisp, and the magic of Lapland is all around you.
You might also be interested in following articles: